Moreso then that, the idea of the "Brotherhood of Evil mutants" is so functionally basic as an enemy team for the good guys of the franchise to face that his role as a leader or lietenant of the group (or more accurately the idea that he would be this because of his relationship) is synonymous with the character.Įven some of his modern characterization is seemingly feuled by the idea that he has this relationship with Magneto that complicates and motivates his actions as a villain and hero. Something which is present but unfleshed out within early X-Men. 2/3 of the Cartoons focused heavily on his interactions with early versions of the X-Men teams and his connection to Magneto. In the new timeline, which began in X-Men: Days of Future Past, little is known of Peter's childhood, but it can be inferred that he was raised by his single mother due to his father leaving her before Peter was born. Technically they had 1 cartoon, and a Ironman cartoon season that was basically the Avengers as his sidekicks.īut lets be honest. Quicksilver's only appearance in the original timeline was a small cameo. Quicksilver is alright in a lesser role but I don't understand why X-Men fans would want to see this guy become the star of the movies. I would like to see the movies star the same charecters from the comics or even the cartoons. The popular opinion seems to be that making Mystique a main character in the movies was a misstep. I think he might of been a recurring charecter in X-Men Evolution though. Mystique has always been a recurring villain. The games were not even called Avengers, they were called "Marvel Super Heroes" and also featured Wolverine and Spider-Man. Before the movies started the Avengers had 0 cartoons and maybe 1 or 2 games from the SNES era. Maybe that is because X-Men have existed in other forms of media and until recently the Avengers did not.
Lol Quicksilver has been in more X-Men media then Avengers.Īside from the mainline comics hes almost as relevant to the franchise as Mystique.
0 kommentar(er)
